Modeling doping cognition from a dual process perspective

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Die Doping-Wahrnehmung aus einer dualen Prozessperspektive modellieren
Autor:Brand, Ralf; Wolff, Wanja; Baumgarten, Franz
Erschienen in:The Psychology of doping in sport
Veröffentlicht:London: Routledge (Verlag), 2016, S. 33-42, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Sammelwerksbeitrag
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201710008795
Quelle:BISp
TY  - COLL
AU  - Brand, Ralf
A2  - Brand, Ralf
A2  - Wolff, Wanja
A2  - Baumgarten, Franz
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Doping
KW  - Dopingbekämpfung
KW  - Dopingkontrolle
KW  - Dopingnachweis
KW  - Entscheidungsverhalten
KW  - Kognition
KW  - Kognitionspsychologie
KW  - Psychologie
KW  - Selbstwahrnehmung
KW  - Verhaltenspsychologie
KW  - Wahrnehmung
KW  - Wahrnehmungspsychologie
LA  - eng
PB  - Routledge
CY  - London
TI  - Modeling doping cognition from a dual process perspective
TT  - Die Doping-Wahrnehmung aus einer dualen Prozessperspektive modellieren
PY  - 2016
N2  - From time to time we find ourselves doing things that we never actually intended to do. For example, although one makes a firm decision to avoid unnecessary calories, one may find oneself unable to resist “spontaneously” taking a piece of a delicious cheesecake. Is it possible and reasonable to suggest that something similar may take place in the context of doping behavior? From a more general psychological viewpoint there sometimes seem to be two forces at work, one that is very immediate and more or less uncontrollable and another that is more considered, i.e., based on reasoned thinking and a – possibly subjective – idea of what is rational. This distinction is at the core of psychological dual process approaches. At its most general, dual process theories assume that motivated behavior is rooted in two different kinds of thinking. Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman has stated the characteristic differences between the two types of thought in a clear, comprehensive manner and assigned them into two different cognitive systems: The operations of System 1 are typically fast, automatic, effortless, associative, implicit (not available to introspection), and often emotionally charged; they are also governed by habit and are therefore difficult to control or modify. The operations of System 2 are slower, serial, effortful, more likely to be consciously monitored and deliberately controlled; they are also rela­ tively flexible and potentially rule governed.
L2  - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281097576_Modeling_doping_cognition_from_a_dual_process_perspective
L2  - https://www.routledge.com/The-Psychology-of-Doping-in-Sport/Barkoukis-Lazuras-Tsorbatzoudis/p/book/9781138793477
SP  - S. 33-42
BT  - The Psychology of doping in sport
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
ID  - PU201710008795
ER  -