A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Eine Metaanalyse von periodisierten gegenüber nicht-periodisierten Krafttrainings- und Schnellkrafttrainingsprogrammen
Autor:Rhea, Matthew R.; Alderman, Brandon L.
Erschienen in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport
Veröffentlicht:75 (2004), 4, S. 413-422, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0270-1367, 2168-3824
DOI:10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200908003912
Quelle:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rhea, Matthew R.
A2  - Rhea, Matthew R.
A2  - Alderman, Brandon L.
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Altersgruppe
KW  - Anpassung, physiologische
KW  - Forschungsstand
KW  - Geschlecht
KW  - Krafttraining
KW  - Kraftzuwachs
KW  - Metaanalyse
KW  - Schnellkrafttraining
KW  - Trainingseffektivität
KW  - Trainingshäufigkeit
KW  - Trainingsintensität
KW  - Trainingsperiodisierung
KW  - Trainingsprogramm
KW  - Trainingsreiz
KW  - Trainingsumfang
KW  - Trainingswissenschaft
KW  - Trainingszustand
KW  - Trainingszyklus
KW  - Untersuchung, vergleichende
LA  - eng
TI  - A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs
TT  - Eine Metaanalyse von periodisierten gegenüber nicht-periodisierten Krafttrainings- und Schnellkrafttrainingsprogrammen
PY  - 2004
N2  - The purpose of this study was to quantitatively combine and examine the results of studies examining the effectiveness of periodized (PER) compared to nonperiodized (Non-PER) training programs for strength and/or power development. Two analyses were conducted to examine the magnitude of treatment effect elicited by PER strength training programs compared to Non-PER programs and to compare these effects after controlling for training volume, frequency, and intensity. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were coded based on characteristics that might moderate the overall effects (i.e., participant characteristics and characteristics related to the training program). Effect sizes (ESs) were calculated for each study, and an overall ES of 0.84 (+/- 1.41) favoring PER training was found. Further analyses identified the treatment effect specific to training variation to be ES=0.25. Significant moderating variables included age, training status, and length of training program. As a result of this statistical review of the literature, it is concluded that PER training is more effective than Non-PER training for men and women, individuals of varying training backgrounds, and for all age groups. In line with the overload principle, additions to volume, intensity, and frequency result in additional training adaptations. Verf.-Referat
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174
DO  - 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174
SP  - S. 413-422
SN  - 0270-1367
JO  - Research quarterly for exercise and sport
IS  - 4
VL  - 75
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
ID  - PU200908003912
ER  -