A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs
Gespeichert in:
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Eine Metaanalyse von periodisierten gegenüber nicht-periodisierten Krafttrainings- und Schnellkrafttrainingsprogrammen |
---|---|
Autor: | Rhea, Matthew R.; Alderman, Brandon L. |
Erschienen in: | Research quarterly for exercise and sport |
Veröffentlicht: | 75 (2004), 4, S. 413-422, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online) |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 0270-1367, 2168-3824 |
DOI: | 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU200908003912 |
Quelle: | BISp |
TY - JOUR AU - Rhea, Matthew R. A2 - Rhea, Matthew R. A2 - Alderman, Brandon L. DB - BISp DP - BISp KW - Altersgruppe KW - Anpassung, physiologische KW - Forschungsstand KW - Geschlecht KW - Krafttraining KW - Kraftzuwachs KW - Metaanalyse KW - Schnellkrafttraining KW - Trainingseffektivität KW - Trainingshäufigkeit KW - Trainingsintensität KW - Trainingsperiodisierung KW - Trainingsprogramm KW - Trainingsreiz KW - Trainingsumfang KW - Trainingswissenschaft KW - Trainingszustand KW - Trainingszyklus KW - Untersuchung, vergleichende LA - eng TI - A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs TT - Eine Metaanalyse von periodisierten gegenüber nicht-periodisierten Krafttrainings- und Schnellkrafttrainingsprogrammen PY - 2004 N2 - The purpose of this study was to quantitatively combine and examine the results of studies examining the effectiveness of periodized (PER) compared to nonperiodized (Non-PER) training programs for strength and/or power development. Two analyses were conducted to examine the magnitude of treatment effect elicited by PER strength training programs compared to Non-PER programs and to compare these effects after controlling for training volume, frequency, and intensity. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were coded based on characteristics that might moderate the overall effects (i.e., participant characteristics and characteristics related to the training program). Effect sizes (ESs) were calculated for each study, and an overall ES of 0.84 (+/- 1.41) favoring PER training was found. Further analyses identified the treatment effect specific to training variation to be ES=0.25. Significant moderating variables included age, training status, and length of training program. As a result of this statistical review of the literature, it is concluded that PER training is more effective than Non-PER training for men and women, individuals of varying training backgrounds, and for all age groups. In line with the overload principle, additions to volume, intensity, and frequency result in additional training adaptations. Verf.-Referat L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174 DO - 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174 SP - S. 413-422 SN - 0270-1367 JO - Research quarterly for exercise and sport IS - 4 VL - 75 M3 - Gedruckte Ressource M3 - Elektronische Ressource (online) ID - PU200908003912 ER -