Perceptions of cheating and doping in e-cycling

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Auffassungen zu Betrug und Doping im E-Cycling
Autor:Richardson, Andrew; Berger, Nicolas; Smith, Phillip
Erschienen in:Sports
Veröffentlicht:11 (2023), 10, Art.-ID 201, [18 S.], Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:2075-4663
DOI:10.3390/sports11100201
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202312011097
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

E-cycling is a growing area of cycling appealing to competitive cyclists and fitness enthusiasts. Zwift is the most popular e-cycling platform, with approx. 1 million subscribers and is a virtual environment that hosts regular races, including the UCI e-cycling world championships. The popularity of Zwift has given rise to cases of cheating and hacking the system to gain an advantage in e-racing. As a result, some high-profile professional riders have faced bans. We set out to understand the thoughts and concerns e-cyclists have about cheating, hacking, and doping in e-cycling. A total of 337 females and 1130 males were recruited over a 7-week period via social networking sites to complete an online survey. Forty-four per cent had experienced cheating during e-racing, which made them feel angry, annoyed, disappointed, and cheated. However, 15% of those who experienced cheating said they did not care, possibly because many see e-racing as a game or training tool rather than a competitive event. Eighty-seven per cent of participants were in favour of enforcing a ban on cheaters in e-cycling, while 34% wanted cheaters to be banned during in-person cycling events too. Results indicate that many e-cyclists have experienced cheating and would like clearer rules and bans for cheaters during e-races.