Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title translated into German:Bioelektrische Impedanzanalyse im Vergleich zu Referenzmethoden bei der Beurteilung der Körperzusammensetzung bei Sportlern
Author:Campa, Francesco; Gobbo, Luís Alberto; Stagi, Silvia; Cyrino, Leticia Trindade; Toselli, Stefania; Marini, Elisabetta; Coratella, Giuseppe
Published in:European journal of applied physiology
Published:122 (2022), 3, S. 561-589, Lit.
Format: Publications (Database SPOLIT)
Publication Type: Journal article
Media type: Print resource Electronic resource (online)
Language:English
ISSN:1439-6319, 0301-5548
DOI:10.1007/s00421-021-04879-y
Keywords:
Online Access:
Identification number:PU202204002873
Source:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Campa, Francesco
A2  - Campa, Francesco
A2  - Gobbo, Luís Alberto
A2  - Stagi, Silvia
A2  - Cyrino, Leticia Trindade
A2  - Toselli, Stefania
A2  - Marini, Elisabetta
A2  - Coratella, Giuseppe
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Impedanzmessverfahren
KW  - Körperbaudaten
KW  - Körperfett
KW  - Körpermasse, fettfreie
KW  - Körperwasser, interstitielles
KW  - Leistungsphysiologie
KW  - Literaturübersicht
KW  - Methodenvergleich
KW  - Modellmerkmal
KW  - Sportler
KW  - Untersuchung, vergleichende
KW  - Untersuchungsmethode
LA  - eng
TI  - Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes
TT  - Bioelektrische Impedanzanalyse im Vergleich zu Referenzmethoden bei der Beurteilung der Körperzusammensetzung bei Sportlern
PY  - 2022
N2  - The present systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) vs. reference methods for the assessment of body composition in athletes. Studies were identified based on a systematic search of internationally electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) and hand searching of the reference lists of the included studies. In total, 42 studies published between 1988 and 2021 were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies as recommended by the National Institute of Health. Twenty-three studies had an overall good rating in terms of quality, while 13 were rated as fair and 6 as poor, resulting in a low to moderate risk of bias. Fat mass was inconsistently determined using BIA vs. the reference methods, regardless of the BIA-technology. When using the foot to hand technology with predictive equations for athletes, a good agreement between BIA and the reference methods was observed for fat-free mass, total body, intra and extra cellular water. However, an underestimation in fat-free mass and body fluids was found when using generalized predictive equations. Classic and Specific BIVA represented a valid approach for assessing body fluids (Classic BIVA) and percentage of fat mass (Specific BIVA). The present systematic review suggests that BIA and BIVA can be used for assessing body composition in athletes, provided that foot-to-hand technology, predictive equations, and BIVA references for athletes are used.
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04879-y
DO  - 10.1007/s00421-021-04879-y
SP  - S. 561-589
SN  - 1439-6319
JO  - European journal of applied physiology
IS  - 3
VL  - 122
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
ID  - PU202204002873
ER  -