Interpreting daily heart rate variability changes in collegiate female soccer players

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Interpretation täglicher Schwankungen der Herzfrequenzvariabilität bei College-Fußballspielerinnen
Autor:Flatt, Andrew A.; Esco, Michael R.; Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo; Plews, Daniel J.
Erschienen in:The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
Veröffentlicht:57 (2017), 6, S. 907-915, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0022-4707, 1827-1928
DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06322-2
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201708006072
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) is an objective physiological marker that may be useful for monitoring training status in athletes. However, research aiming to interpret daily HRV changes in female athletes is limited. The objectives of this study were: 1) to assess daily HRV (i.e., log-transformed root mean square of successive R-R interval differences, lnRMSSD) trends both as a team and intra-individually in response to varying training load (TL); and 2) to determine relationships between lnRMSSD fluctuation (coefficient of variation, lnRMSSDcv) and psychometric and fitness parameters in collegiate female soccer players (N.=10). METHODS: Ultra-short, Smartphone-derived lnRMSSD and psychometrics were evaluated daily throughout 2 consecutive weeks of high and low TL. After the training period, fitness parameters were assessed. RESULTS: When compared to baseline, reductions in lnRMSSD ranged from unclear to very likely moderate during the high TL week (effect size ±90% confidence limits [ES±90% CL] =-0.21±0.74 to -0.64±0.78, respectively) while lnRMSSD reductions were unclear during the low TL week (ES±90% CL=-0.03±0.73 to -0.35±0.75, respectively). A large difference in TL between weeks was observed (ES±90% CL=1.37±0.80). Higher lnRMSSDcv was associated with greater perceived fatigue and lower fitness (r [upper and lower 90% CL]=-0.55 [-0.84, -0.003] large, -0.65 [-0.89, -0.15] large). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with lower fitness or higher perceived fatigue demonstrated greater reductions in lnRMSSD throughout training. This information can be useful when interpreting individual lnRMSSD responses throughout training for managing player fatigue.