A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test
Gespeichert in:
| Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Ein Vergleich von zwei Messsystemen für anaerobe Tests anhand des Oberkörper-Wingate-Tests |
|---|---|
| Autor: | Talbot, Chris; Kay, Tony D.; Walker, Natalie; Price, Mike J. |
| Erschienen in: | Research in sports medicine |
| Veröffentlicht: | 22 (2014), 3, S. 265-275, Lit. |
| Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
| Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
| Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| ISSN: | 1543-8627, 1543-8635 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15438627.2014.915836 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | |
| Erfassungsnummer: | PU201502001363 |
| Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
This study aimed to compare performance measures acquired by two different Wingate Anaerobic Test systems; Cranlea and Monark. Twenty participants undertook 58 Wingate tests against a 4 percent body mass resistive load on a cycle ergometer adapted for arm cranking. Corrected peak power output (PP; W) was recorded using 1 rev/min, 0.5, 1 and 5 s averages and mean power output (MP; W). The Cranlea system recorded the greatest PP (589 +/- 267 W) compared with the Monark (546 +/- 267 W; P < 0.001). The PP using all other methods was also greater for the Cranlea compared with the Monark system (P < 0.001) with mean differences of 55 +/- 18 W for 1 s averages and 22 +/- 18 W for MP. Correlations between all PPs were strong (r = 0.99 - 0.97; P < 0.001). In conclusion, although the Cranlea system provides a consistently greater corrected PP it may not be enough to substantially differentiate between systems. Verf.-Referat