Comparison of four reconstructive methods for diaphyseal defects of the humerus after tumor resection
Gespeichert in:
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Der Vergleich von vier Rekonstruktionsmethoden von Diaphysenschäden des Humerus nach Tumorresektion |
---|---|
Autor: | Sakellariou, Vasileios I.; Mavrogenis, Andreas F.; Babis, George C.; Soucacos, Panayiotis N.; Magnissalis, Evangelos A.; Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J. |
Erschienen in: | Journal of applied biomechanics |
Veröffentlicht: | 28 (2012), 5, S. 568–578, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (Datenträger) |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 1065-8483, 1543-2688 |
DOI: | 10.1123/jab.28.5.568 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201304002641 |
Quelle: | BISp |
TY - JOUR AU - Sakellariou, Vasileios I. A2 - Sakellariou, Vasileios I. A2 - Mavrogenis, Andreas F. A2 - Babis, George C. A2 - Soucacos, Panayiotis N. A2 - Magnissalis, Evangelos A. A2 - Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J. DB - BISp DP - BISp KW - Analyse, biomechanische KW - Belastung, mechanische KW - Bewegungslehre KW - Biomechanik KW - Chirurgie KW - Humerus KW - Humerusfraktur KW - Hüftgelenkendoprothese KW - Methodenvergleich KW - Sportmedizin LA - eng TI - Comparison of four reconstructive methods for diaphyseal defects of the humerus after tumor resection TT - Der Vergleich von vier Rekonstruktionsmethoden von Diaphysenschäden des Humerus nach Tumorresektion PY - 2012 N2 - The objective of the current study was to compare quantitative data on the biomechanical analysis of different techniques for fixation of intercalary bone defects of the humerus, by means of consistently applied methodology on composite models. A total of 25 humeral specimens of composite models were used. An intercalary defect was created and reconstructed using plates, intramedullary nails, external fixators and segmental prosthetic implants. The specimens were loaded under axial compression, four-point bending and torsion within the linear elastic region. Modular segmental implants and intramedullary nails were able to compensate significantly greater amounts of compressive loads compared to locking plates and external fixators. However, in flexion and torsion, the modular segmental implants and the external fixators were significantly better load-bearing devices compared to the intramedullary nails and plates. Early mobilization of the upper limb in patients with diaphyseal bone defects of the humerus could probably be more safe and tolerable when reconstructed with modular segmental implants. Verf.-Referat L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.28.5.568 DO - 10.1123/jab.28.5.568 SP - S. 568–578 SN - 1065-8483 JO - Journal of applied biomechanics IS - 5 VL - 28 M3 - Gedruckte Ressource M3 - Elektronische Ressource (Datenträger) ID - PU201304002641 ER -