Comparison of four reconstructive methods for diaphyseal defects of the humerus after tumor resection

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Der Vergleich von vier Rekonstruktionsmethoden von Diaphysenschäden des Humerus nach Tumorresektion
Autor:Sakellariou, Vasileios I.; Mavrogenis, Andreas F.; Babis, George C.; Soucacos, Panayiotis N.; Magnissalis, Evangelos A.; Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J.
Erschienen in:Journal of applied biomechanics
Veröffentlicht:28 (2012), 5, S. 568–578, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (Datenträger)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1065-8483, 1543-2688
DOI:10.1123/jab.28.5.568
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201304002641
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to compare quantitative data on the biomechanical analysis of different techniques for fixation of intercalary bone defects of the humerus, by means of consistently applied methodology on composite models. A total of 25 humeral specimens of composite models were used. An intercalary defect was created and reconstructed using plates, intramedullary nails, external fixators and segmental prosthetic implants. The specimens were loaded under axial compression, four-point bending and torsion within the linear elastic region. Modular segmental implants and intramedullary nails were able to compensate significantly greater amounts of compressive loads compared to locking plates and external fixators. However, in flexion and torsion, the modular segmental implants and the external fixators were significantly better load-bearing devices compared to the intramedullary nails and plates. Early mobilization of the upper limb in patients with diaphyseal bone defects of the humerus could probably be more safe and tolerable when reconstructed with modular segmental implants. Verf.-Referat