Differences in physiological characterization between Yo-Yo Intermittent recovery test level 1 and level 2 in japanese college soccer players

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Unterschiede in der physiologischen Charakterisierung japanischer Hochschul-Fußballspieler mit Hilfe Yo-Yo Intermittierender Erholungstests des Levels 1 und 2
Autor:Ueda, Shin-ya; Yamanaka, Akira; Yoshikawa, Takahiro; Katsura, Yoshihiro ; Usui, Tatsuya; Orita, Keisuke; Fujimoto, Shigeo
Erschienen in:International journal of sport and health science
Veröffentlicht:9 (2011), S. 33-38, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1880-4012, 0915-3942, 1348-1509
DOI:10.5432/ijshs.20100032
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201110009014
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

We aim to investigate the differences in physiological characterization between Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) and level 2 (Yo-Yo IR2) in Japanese college soccer players. Eighty-two Japanese college soccer players (elite, n=40; non-elite, n=42) participated in the study. All subjects took part in three tests Yo-Yo IR1, Yo-Yo IR2, and laboratory treadmilltests. The order of the three tests was randomized across subjects. The Yo-Yo IR1 test was not signifficantly different between elite (2369.0±319.2 m) and non-elite (2315.2±346.3 m) players. In contrast, the Yo-Yo IR2 test was signifficantly diŠerent between elite (1035.0±147.5 m) and non-elite (919.0±119.3 m) players. Anaerobic threshold (AT) was signifficantly correlated with both Yo-Yo IR1 and Yo-Yo IR2, although the correlation was stronger for Yo-Yo IR2. Our findings suggest that the Yo-Yo IR2 test will probably be a better tool than Yo-Yo IR1 in measuring endurance capacity in Japanese college soccer players. Verf.-Referat