Abstract des Autors

This study surveyed the case law precedents forming the legal framework within which the athletic trainer functions in the performance of his or her duties to determine what effect those precedents have on athletic training education. A computerized legal search system (Lexis) identified thirteen cases. These were analyzed to determine their relationship to the research questions. This limited data permit several conclusions. First, all major tasks identified in the NATA Competencies were addressed in issues before the court. Second, there appears to be no contradiction by the courts in the competencies. Finally, there are issues raised by the courts but not described in the competencies. The study identified three areas requiring deliberation and response from the profession. There is a need to: 1) define the relationship between athletic trainers and assistants or student trainers; 2) define specific areas of practice and responsibility assigned to athletic trainers; and 3) identify the nature and scope of confidentiality in the relationship between athlete and athletic trainer. Verf.-Referat