Abstract

This study surveyed the case law precedents forming the legal framework within which the athletic trainer functions in the performance of his or her duties. A computerized legal search system was used to identify this case law which included the state and federal cases in all 50 states from 1960 to July, 1989. Thirteen cases were identified and analysed. There were four other cases which referred to the role of the athletic trainer in the arguments of the case. These data permit several conclusions. First, those athletic trainers working football are at greater risk of litigation than those working other sports. Athletic trainers at colleges and universities are more at risk than those at other levels. Second, economics may provide some explanation for the relative paucity of suits against athletic trainers. Third, cases occurred with greater frequency since 1980. Fourth, the identification of the complex and interdependent roles and responsibilities assigned to the the athletic trainer emerges as a major implication of this review. Finally, the responsibilities of the athletic trainer are indistinguishable from those assigned to the physician and coaches. Two recommendations emerged from this study. First, there is a continued need to monitor judicial decisions which involve athletic trainers. Second, since this review identified only reported litigation, more research is needed to establish baseline information about the actual number of disputes and dispute resolution patterns arising from the practice of athletic trainers. V.-R.