Exercise interventions for people undergoing multimodal cancer treatment that includes surgery

Autor: Loughney, Lisa A; West, Malcolm A; Kemp, Graham J; Grocott, Michael PW; Jack, Sandy
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Quelle: PubMed Central (PMC)
Online Zugang: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517034/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012280.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517034/
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012280.pub2
Erfassungsnummer: ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6517034

Zusammenfassung

BACKGROUND: People undergoing multimodal cancer treatment are at an increased risk of adverse events. Physical fitness significantly reduces following cancer treatment, which is related to poor postoperative outcome. Exercise training can stimulate skeletal muscle adaptations, such as increased mitochondrial content and improved oxygen uptake capacity may contribute to improved physical fitness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of exercise interventions for people undergoing multimodal treatment for cancer, including surgery, on physical fitness, safety, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), fatigue, and postoperative outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched electronic databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and trial registries up to October 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of exercise training with usual care, on physical fitness, safety, HRQoL, fatigue, and postoperative outcomes in people undergoing multimodal cancer treatment, including surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, performed the data extraction, assessed the risk of bias, and rated the quality of the studies using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We pooled data for meta‐analyses, where possible, and reported these as mean differences using the random‐effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were identified involving 1067 participants; 568 were randomly allocated to an exercise intervention and 499 to a usual care control group. The majority of participants received treatment for breast cancer (73%). Due to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to blind the participants or personnel delivering the intervention. The risk of detection bias was either high or unclear in some cases, whilst most other domains were rated as low risk. The included studies were of moderate to very low‐certainty evidence. ...