Effect of Postural Changes on Resting Metabolic Rate and Substrate Utilization
Autor: | Tahir Hazır; Gökhan Denizli; Süleyman Ulupınar; Nihat Özgören; Mustafa Can Eser; Funda Büşra Dumankaya; Ayşe Kin İşler |
---|---|
Sprache: | Englisch; Türkisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2018 |
Quelle: | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
Online Zugang: |
http://journalofsportsmedicine.org/eng/full-text-pdf/346/tur https://doaj.org/toc/1300-0551 https://doaj.org/toc/2587-1498 1300-0551 2587-1498 doi:10.5152/tjsm.2018.103 https://doaj.org/article/e91d0eeb9899442891e7e0e85919464a https://doi.org/10.5152/tjsm.2018.103 https://doaj.org/article/e91d0eeb9899442891e7e0e85919464a |
Erfassungsnummer: | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e91d0eeb9899442891e7e0e85919464a |
Zusammenfassung
Objective: While supine position is the classical method to measure resting metabolic rate (RMR), the effects of postural changes on RMR is not clear. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of postural changes on RMR and substrate utilization. Material and Methods: RMR was measured in 23 sedentary male subjects (age: 26.7±5.8 yr) after an overnight fast for 10 min in random order for supine, sitting and standing positions. An automated gas analysis system was used to measure oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE), and heart rate (HR) to determine RMR. RMR was calculated with Weir’s formula, whereas rates of carbohydrate (CHO) and free fatty acid (FFA) utilization were calculated with Frayn’s formula. One way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used to calculate the effect of postural changes on variables, and one sample t-Test was used to identify the difference between resting VO2 and 1 MET levels. Results: RMR values measured in supine and sitting positions were similar, both of which were significantly lower than those measured in the standing position (p