Interrepetition Rest Set Lacks the V-Shape Systolic Pressure Response Advantage during Resistance Exercise

Autor: Xian Mayo; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; J. Derek Kingsley; Xurxo Dopico
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/5/4/90
https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4663
2075-4663
doi:10.3390/sports5040090
https://doaj.org/article/e8723cbc280d4f02a91c321d1a2aa113
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports5040090
https://doaj.org/article/e8723cbc280d4f02a91c321d1a2aa113
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e8723cbc280d4f02a91c321d1a2aa113

Zusammenfassung

Resistance exercise may lead to an aneurysm due to dangerous levels of systemic hypertension. Thus, a minimized pressure response during exercise may guarantee safer training. For that, we analyzed an interrepetition rest design (IRD) hypothesizing that it would produce a lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) response in comparison with a continuous design (CD). Additionally, we studied the effect of accumulated repetitions on the increasing SBP rate during the first continuous set. Fifteen healthy participants (age: 24 ± 2 years; SBP: 113 ± 8 mmHg) performed leg presses, with 40 repetitions and 720 s of total rest, structured in an IRD of individual repetitions (resting time: 18.5 s), and in a CD of five sets of eight repetitions (resting time: 180 s). Analyses reported an increase (p = 0.013) in the mean peaks of SBP in the IRD (162 ± 21 mmHg), versus the CD (148 ± 19 mmHg), while both augmented versus baselines (p < 0.001). Additionally, the linear model estimated a progressive increase of SBP of around 7 mmHg per repetition. Summarily, the IRD produced a higher mean of the SBP peaks during the 40 repetitions due to lacking the v-shape advantage in comparison with the CD.