The Impact of a Challenge-Based Learning Experience in Physical Education on Students’ Motivation and Engagement

Autor: Luis Simón-Chico; Alba González-Peño; Ernesto Hernández-Cuadrado; Evelia Franco
Sprache: Englisch; Spanisch
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/4/52
https://doaj.org/toc/2174-8144
https://doaj.org/toc/2254-9625
doi:10.3390/ejihpe13040052
2254-9625
2174-8144
https://doaj.org/article/cf6d35ab0c314e609ee8f91bc98987fa
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13040052
https://doaj.org/article/cf6d35ab0c314e609ee8f91bc98987fa
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:cf6d35ab0c314e609ee8f91bc98987fa

Zusammenfassung

The present study investigated how challenge-based learning (CBL) in physical education (PE) may affect students’ basic psychological needs (BPNs), motivational regulations, engagement, and learning in comparison with a traditional teaching (TT) methodology. A quasiexperimental study with experimental and control groups was carried out. In total, 50 participants (16 boys and 34 girls) between 13 and 15 years old (M age = 13.35, SD = 0.62) were involved in the experience for 6 weeks (n control = 24; n experimental = 26). Validated questionnaires were administered both before and after the intervention in both groups. Furthermore, theoretical knowledge and badminton-specific motor skill tests were carried out in both groups after the intervention. An analysis showed that after the intervention, students in the CBL condition improved their autonomy (M before = 3.15 vs. M after = 3.39; ES = 0.26 *), competence (M before = 4.01 vs. M after = 4.18; ES = 0.33 *), and relatedness satisfaction (M before = 3.86 vs. M after = 4.06; ES = 0.32 *). As for behavioural engagement measures, students in the CBL condition exhibited higher scores after than those from before (M before = 4.12 vs. M after = 4.36; ES = 0.35 *). No significant changes were observed for motivational regulations or agentic engagement. On learning outcomes, students in the experimental group achieved higher scores in both theoretical knowledge (M contol = 6.48 vs. M experimental = 6.79) and badminton-specific motor skills (M contol = 6.85 vs. M experimental = 7.65) than the control group did. The present study findings highlight that CBL might be a valid and effective methodological approach for students in PE to achieve adaptive motivational, behavioural, and learning outcomes.