An assessment of the usefulness of a rapid immuno-chromatographic test, "Determine™ malaria pf" in evaluation of intervention measures in forest villages of central India

Autor: Shukla Manmohan; Singh Neeru
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2001
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/1/10
https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2334
doi:10.1186/1471-2334-1-10
1471-2334
https://doaj.org/article/c15ba8f834d248f8ae781c7e8de366b4
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-1-10
https://doaj.org/article/c15ba8f834d248f8ae781c7e8de366b4
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c15ba8f834d248f8ae781c7e8de366b4

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background Plasmodium falciparum malaria, is a major health problem in forested tribal belt of central India. Rapid and accurate methods are needed for the diagnosis of P. falciparum. We performed a blinded evaluation of the recently introduced Determine™ malaria pf test (Abbott, Laboratories, Japan) compared with microscopy and splenomegaly in children in epidemic prone areas of district Mandla to assess the impact of intervention measures. Methods Children aged 2–10 yrs with and without fever were examined for spleen enlargement by medical specialist by establishing a mobile field clinic. From these children thick blood smears were prepared from finger prick and read by a technician. Simultaneously, rapid tests were performed by a field lab attendant. The figures for specificity, sensitivity and predictive values were calculated using microscopy as gold standard. Results In all 349 children were examined. The sensitivity and specificity for Determine rapid diagnostic test were 91 and 80% respectively. The positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and accuracy of the test were respectively 79, 91 and 85%. On the contrary, the sensitivity and specificity of spleen in detecting malaria infection were 57 and 74 % respectively with PPV of 73%, NPV 59 % and an accuracy of 65%. Conclusions Determine™ malaria rapid diagnostic test is easier and quicker to perform and has other advantages over microscopy in not requiring prior training of personnel or quality control. Thus, highlighting the usefulness of a rapid antigen test in assessing prevailing malaria situation in remote areas.