Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke’s Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation

Autor: Hegazy F; Aboelnasr E; Abuzaid M; Kim IJ; Salem Y
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://www.dovepress.com/comparing-validity-and-diagnostic-accuracy-of-clarkes-angle-and-foot-p-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH
https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390
1178-2390
https://doaj.org/article/beadd2037bce40d0887a4f2372f97f20
https://doaj.org/article/beadd2037bce40d0887a4f2372f97f20
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:beadd2037bce40d0887a4f2372f97f20

Zusammenfassung

Fatma Hegazy,1,2 Emad Aboelnasr,2 Mohamed Abuzaid,3 In-Ju Kim,4 Yasser Salem5 1Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 2Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; 3Department of Medical Diagnostic Imaging, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 4Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; College of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 5Department of Health Professions, School of Health Professions and Human Services, Hofstra University, Long Island, NY, USACorrespondence: Fatma HegazyDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab EmiratesEmail fhegazy@sharjah.ac.aeObjective: Clinically, the foot posture index-6 (FPI-6) and Clarke’s angle (CA) are widely utilized to assess static foot posture; however, due to scarcity of scientific evidence, clinicians continue to debate the validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures in children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the FPI-6 and CA in determining adolescents’ flexible flatfoot between ages of 12 and 18 years, considering radiographic investigation as a reference standard measure.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: Governmental hospitals.Participants and Methods: A sample of 460 people (920 feet) with flexible flatfoot between the ages of 12 and 18 (15.23 ± 0.84 years) was enrolled in the study. The findings of the investigated measures were compared to the reference standard radiographic measure and plotted on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was determined as a measure of FPI-6 and CA diagnostic accuracy. Intra-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of FPI-6 and CA were calculated and compared. The post-test probability of flatfoot was determined using the ...