The effectiveness of treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) delivered by community health workers compared to a traditional facility based model

Autor: J. L. Alvarez Morán; G. B. Franck Alé; P. Charle; N. Sessions; S. Doumbia; S. Guerrero
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z
https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963
doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z
1472-6963
https://doaj.org/article/8acfa805165f476584ebb00abb5b0b00
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z
https://doaj.org/article/8acfa805165f476584ebb00abb5b0b00
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8acfa805165f476584ebb00abb5b0b00

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background In most health systems, Community Health Workers (CHWs) identify and screen for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in the community. This study aimed to investigate the potential of integrating SAM identification and treatment delivered by CHWs, in order to improve the coverage of SAM treatment services. Methods This multicentre, randomised intervention study was conducted in Kita, Southwest Mali between February 2015 and February 2016. Treatment for uncomplicated SAM was provided in health facilities in the control area, and by Community Health Workers and health facilities in the intervention area. Clinical outcomes (cure, death and defaulter ratios), treatment coverage and quality of care were examined in both the control and intervention group. Results Six hundred ninety nine children were admitted to the intervention group and 235 children to the control group. The intervention group reported cure ratios of 94.2% compared to 88.6% in the control group (risk ratio 1.07 [95% CI 1.01; 1.13]). Defaulter ratios were twice as high in the control group compared to the intervention group (10.8% vs 4.5%; RR 0.42 [95% CI 0.25; 0.71]). Differences in mortality ratios were not statistically significant (0.9% in the intervention group compared to 0.8% in the control group). Coverage rates in December 2015 were 86.7% in intervention group compared to 41.6% in the control (p < 0.0001). Conclusions With minimal training, CHWs are able to appropriately treat SAM in the community. Allowing CHWs to treat SAM reduces defaulter ratios without compromising treatment outcomes and can lead to improved access to treatment. Trial registration Retrospectively registered in ISRCTN Register with ISRCTN33578874 on March 7th 2018.