How do medical students value health on the EQ-5D? Evaluation of hypothetical health states compared to the general population

Autor: Rumpold Gerhard; Noisternig Bianca; Renn Daniela; Barbist Maria-Theresa; Höfer Stefan
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.hqlo.com/content/6/1/111
https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7525
doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-111
1477-7525
https://doaj.org/article/8204f48d1a2c4022ab75a0f49e7dbf44
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-111
https://doaj.org/article/8204f48d1a2c4022ab75a0f49e7dbf44
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:8204f48d1a2c4022ab75a0f49e7dbf44

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background Medical students gain a particular perspective on health problems during their medical education. This article describes how medical students value 10 hypothetical health states using the EQ-5D compared to the general population. Methods Based on a sample of 161 medical students (male: 41%) we compared valuations of 10 hypothetical EQ-5D health states collected in face to face interviews with the valuations of the general population. Self-reported health on the EQ-5D was also collected. Results Every third health state was valuated higher by the medical students compared to data of the general population. The differences were independent of the severity of the hypothetical health state. Concerning the self-reported health, the majority of the students (66%) reported no problems in the five EQ-5D domains (EQ-5D VAS M = 87.3 ± 9.6 SD). However, when compared to an age-matched sample the medical students show significantly more problems in the area of pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Conclusion Medical students have a tendency to value health states higher than the general public. Medical professionals should be continuously aware that their assessment of the patients health state can differ from the valuations of the general population.