Lay health workers perceptions of an anemia control intervention in Karnataka, India: a qualitative study

Autor: Arun S. Shet; Abha Rao; Paul Jebaraj; Maya Mascarenhas; Merrick Zwarenstein; Maria Rosaria Galanti; Salla Atkins
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4758-x
https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458
doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4758-x
1471-2458
https://doaj.org/article/80f4fbdab0bc42769ae1476509e35ea7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4758-x
https://doaj.org/article/80f4fbdab0bc42769ae1476509e35ea7
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:80f4fbdab0bc42769ae1476509e35ea7

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background Lay health workers (LHWs) are increasingly used to complement health services internationally. Their perceptions of the interventions they implement and their experiences in delivering community based interventions in India have been infrequently studied. We developed a novel LHW led intervention to improve anemia cure rates in rural community dwelling children attending village day care centers in South India. Since the intervention is delivered by the village day care center LHW, we sought to understand participating LHWs’ acceptance of and perspectives regarding the intervention, particularly in relation to factors affecting daily implementation. Methods We conducted a qualitative study alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a complex community intervention for childhood anemia control in Karnataka, South India. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with trained LHWs assigned to deliver the educational intervention. These were complemented by non-participant observations of LHWs delivering the intervention. Transcripts of the FGDs were translated and analyzed using the framework analysis method. Results Several factors made the intervention acceptable to the LHWs and facilitated its implementation including pre-implementation training modules, intervention simplicity, and ability to incorporate the intervention into the routine work schedule. LHWs felt that the intervention impacted negatively on their preexisting workload. Fluctuating relationships with mothers weakened the LHWs position as providers of the intervention and hampered efficient implementation, despite the LHWs’ highly valued position in the community. Modifiable barriers to the successful implementation of this intervention were seen at two levels. At a broader contextual level, hindering factors included the LHW being overburdened, inadequately reimbursed, and receiving insufficient employer support. At the health system level, lack of streamlining of LHW duties, inability of LHWs to diagnose ...