Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review

Autor: Manuel Loureiro; Fábio Yuzo Nakamura; Ana Ramos; Patrícia Coutinho; João Ribeiro; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Isabel Mesquita; José Afonso
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12068
https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827
https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601
doi:10.3390/ijerph191912068
1660-4601
1661-7827
https://doaj.org/article/66f1400c810842f8a0dece6c5f7f9a3f
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912068
https://doaj.org/article/66f1400c810842f8a0dece6c5f7f9a3f
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:66f1400c810842f8a0dece6c5f7f9a3f

Zusammenfassung

Quality in education is one of the 17 goals in the United Nations’ sustainable agenda for 2030, presupposing careful planning and assessment of learning. Traditional planning in sports education (either in training or school settings) largely adopts pre-determined learning sequences and temporal milestones that, in theory, enhance the learning process. However, learning is a context-dependent, non-linear process with considerable intra- and interindividual variability, whereby planning and assessment should also be non-linear. In this narrative review, the main findings suggest that the specific teaching or training contents and their relative (i.e., ordering or sequencing) and absolute timing (i.e., the specific time point where certain learning or adaptations are expected) should vary depending on the learners and the context. In a process-oriented perspective, this requires flexible planning and the establishment of ongoing bidirectional links between planning and assessment. In this framework, assessment should be a flexible, evolving, and daily pedagogical tool instead of a set of formal checkpoints. We further explored how planning and assessment could be linked to provide an ongoing feedback loop that respects the individuality of each learner and its context, and therefore hope this review helps bring about a change in current planning and assessment paradigms in sports education.