Functional Range of Motion Following Total Ankle Replacement

Autor: Richard M. Marks MD; William P. Huntington MD; Stephen M. Brennan BSc
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00190
https://doaj.org/toc/2473-0114
2473-0114
doi:10.1177/2473011416S00190
https://doaj.org/article/4faf524722cd43e1a0d726442d1bcb66
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00190
https://doaj.org/article/4faf524722cd43e1a0d726442d1bcb66
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:4faf524722cd43e1a0d726442d1bcb66

Zusammenfassung

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement (TAR) is an accepted option for the surgical treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. The potential benefit of TAR over ankle arthrodesis is the preservation of motion following TAR, however, little is reported concerning the true gain of range of motion (ROM) following TAR. This study compares standard goniometric measurements with two radiographic measurement techniques, as well as reports the changes in ROM following TAR. Methods: Between 2007 and 2012, 48 TAR in 46 patients were performed by a single surgeon, using a modern, fixed-bearing design. 40 patients (19 female, 21 male) had complete clinical and radiographic follow-up greater than 2 years postoperatively. Mean age at surgery was 73 +/- 9 years. Patients were evaluated with pre-operative and 2 year post-operative goniometric weight- bearing exam, as well as plantarflexion (PF) and dorsiflexion (DF) lateral radiographs. Radiographs were analyzed using the talocrural method, which measures the angle between the long axis of the tibia and talus, as well as a “full foot” method, which utilizes the angle created by the long axis of the tibia and medial cuneiform. The difference between the PF and DF angles was considered the arc ROM. Means were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to evaluate the significance of the difference between means (p < 0.05) Results: Mean arc range of motion increased from pre-operatively to post-operatively for all methods analyzed. Goniometric arc ROM significantly increased from 27.1° +/- 9.4° to 39.6° +/- 14.0°, a difference of 12.5° +/- 13.6° (p< .001). Talocural arc ROM significantly increased from 22.7° =/- 11.9° to 27. 8° +/- 10.2°, a difference of 5.1° +/- 11.2° (p=.006). Full foot arc ROM increased, but not significantly, from 46.7° +/- 15.5° to 48.8° +/- 12.6°, a difference of 2.6° +/- 11.2° (p=0.154). There was no significant difference observed between the mean gain in arc ROM between the two radiographic measurements (p=.062). However, the ...