Monitoring training load in beach volleyball players: a case study with an Olympic team

Autor: Witalo K. Oliveira; Karla de Jesus; Ana D. Andrade; Fábio Y. Nakamura; Cláudio O. Assumpção; Alexandre I. Medeiros
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742018000100305&lng=en&tlng=en
https://doaj.org/toc/1980-6574
1980-6574
doi:10.1590/s1980-6574201800010004
https://doaj.org/article/386eb85bba024134ad92ae7d01fdf462
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201800010004
https://doaj.org/article/386eb85bba024134ad92ae7d01fdf462
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:386eb85bba024134ad92ae7d01fdf462

Zusammenfassung

Abstract AIM Describe and compare training load dynamics of two Olympic beach volleyball players. METHODS Two Olympic beach volleyball players participated in this study (specialist defender and blocker: both aged 34 years, holding 14 years of competitive experience, height: 1.74 m and 1.81 m, weight: 69 kg and 65 kg, respectively). Internal training load (ITL), total weekly training load (TWTL), monotony and strain were obtained through the session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE) for three training mesocycles (10 weeks). Lower limb explosive power was assessed through the counter movement jump (CMJ). RESULTS Mean ITL, TWTL, monotony and strain during the 10-week period were: 370 ± 156; 1997 ± 838; 2.7 ± 1.3; 5621 ± 1802 arbitrary units (AU) (Defender) and 414 ± 153; 2392 ± 892; 2.7 ± 1.1; 6894 ± 3747 (AU) (Blocker). Mean of CMJ height was 47.0 ± 1.3 and 40.3 ± 1.6 cm, for the defender and blocker, respectively. The defender player presented higher ITL in the second (effect size (ES) = 0.90; 92/5/3, likely) and in the third (ES = 0.91; 94/4/2, likely) mesocycles when compared to the first. Monotony raised from the first to the third mesocycle (ES = 2.91; 98/1/1, very likely). Blocker’s ITL was higher in the third mesocycle than the first (ES = 1.42. 98/1/1, very likely) and the second (ES = 1.49; 98/1/1, likely) ones. CONCLUSION ITL magnitude increased from the first to the third mesocycle, in both players.