Post-exercise contractility, diastolic function, and pressure: Operator-independent sensor-based intelligent monitoring for heart failure telemedicine

Autor: Giannoni Massimo; Faita Francesco; Pianelli Mascia; Pratali Lorenza; Pasanisi Emilio; Bianchini Elisabetta; Gemignani Vincenzo; Bombardini Tonino; Arpesella Giorgio; Sicari Rosa; Picano Eugenio
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2009
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/7/1/21
https://doaj.org/toc/1476-7120
doi:10.1186/1476-7120-7-21
1476-7120
https://doaj.org/article/3564c34f9fcd40b5b69416a948b5c93b
https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-21
https://doaj.org/article/3564c34f9fcd40b5b69416a948b5c93b
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:3564c34f9fcd40b5b69416a948b5c93b

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background New sensors for intelligent remote monitoring of the heart should be developed. Recently, a cutaneous force-frequency relation recording system has been validated based on heart sound amplitude and timing variations at increasing heart rates. Aim To assess sensor-based post-exercise contractility, diastolic function and pressure in normal and diseased hearts as a model of a wireless telemedicine system. Methods We enrolled 150 patients and 22 controls referred for exercise-stress echocardiography, age 55 ± 18 years. The sensor was attached in the precordial region by an ECG electrode. Stress and recovery contractility were derived by first heart sound amplitude vibration changes; diastolic times were acquired continuously. Systemic pressure changes were quantitatively documented by second heart sound recording. Results Interpretable sensor recordings were obtained in all patients (feasibility = 100%). Post-exercise contractility overshoot (defined as increase > 10% of recovery contractility vs exercise value) was more frequent in patients than controls (27% vs 8%, p < 0.05). At 100 bpm stress heart rate, systolic/diastolic time ratio (normal, < 1) was > 1 in 20 patients and in none of the controls (p < 0.01); at recovery systolic/diastolic ratio was > 1 in only 3 patients (p < 0.01 vs stress). Post-exercise reduced arterial pressure was sensed. Conclusion Post-exercise contractility, diastolic time and pressure changes can be continuously measured by a cutaneous sensor. Heart disease affects not only exercise systolic performance, but also post-exercise recovery, diastolic time intervals and blood pressure changes – in our study, all of these were monitored by a non-invasive wearable sensor.