Co-contraction characteristics of lumbar muscles in patients with lumbar disc herniation during different types of movement

Autor: Wenjing Du; Huihui Li; Olatunji Mumini Omisore; Lei Wang; Wenmin Chen; Xiangjun Sun
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12938-018-0443-2
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-925X
doi:10.1186/s12938-018-0443-2
1475-925X
https://doaj.org/article/10ad0ce8349344dd9324fa57276c34b5
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0443-2
https://doaj.org/article/10ad0ce8349344dd9324fa57276c34b5
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:10ad0ce8349344dd9324fa57276c34b5

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background Muscular performance is an important factor for the mechanical stability of lumbar spine in humans, in which, the co-contraction of lumbar muscles plays a key role. We hypothesized that when executing different daily living motions, the performance of the lumbar muscle co-contraction stabilization mechanism varies between patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and healthy controls. Hence, in this study, co-contraction performance of lumbar muscles between patients with LDH and healthy subjects was explored to check if there are significant differences between the two groups when performing four representative movements. Methods Twenty-six LDH patients (15 females, 11 males) and a control group of twenty-eight subjects (16 females, 12 males) were recruited. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the external oblique, lumbar multifidus, and internal oblique/transversus abdominis muscles during the execution of four types of movement, namely: forward bending, backward bending, left lateral flexion and right lateral flexion. The acquired EMG signals were segmented, and wavelet decomposition was performed followed by reconstruction of the low-frequency components of the signal. Then, the reconstructed signals were used for further analysis. Co-contraction ratio was employed to assess muscle coordination and compare it between the LDH patients and healthy controls. The corresponding signals of the subjects in the two groups were compared to evaluate the differences in agonistic and antagonistic muscle performance during the different motions. Also, sample entropy was applied to evaluate complexity changes in lumbar muscle recruitment during the movements. Results Significant differences between the LDH and control groups were found in the studied situations (p < 0.05). During the four movements considered in this study, the participants of the LDH group exhibited a higher level of co-contraction ratio, lower agonistic, and higher antagonistic lumbar muscle activity (p < ...