Assessment of dynamic balancing performance of synchronized ice skaters with sudden provocation test via principal component analysis

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Bewertung der dynamischen Gleichgewichtsleistung von Synchroneisläufern mit einem plötzlichen Provokationstest mittels Hauptkomponentenanalyse
Autor:Pálya, Zsófia; Petró, Bálint; Kiss, Rita M.
Erschienen in:Journal of motor learning and development
Veröffentlicht:10 (2022), 3, S. 504-519, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:2325-3215, 2325-3193
DOI:10.1123/jmld.2021-0059
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202302000873
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Background: Balancing performance can be affected by regular and high-level athletic training, which has not been fully explored in synchronized ice skaters. This study aimed to analyze the dynamic balancing performance by assessing the principal and compensatory movements performed during the sudden provocation tests and evaluating the parameters that characterize the platform’s motion. Method: Twelve young female synchronized ice skaters and 12 female age-matched controls participated. Sudden provocation tests were completed three times in bipedal stance and in single-leg stances, and sport-specific fatigue session was inserted between the repetitions. Results: Significantly more time was necessary to recover balance for both groups after the fatiguing sessions (p < .05). Interestingly, skaters performed less effectively in the simplest condition (bipedal stance) than the control group (p < .05). The principal component analysis showed that the first principal movement was the same for both groups. The skater group used the upper body and arms more often to compensate, while the control group’s recovery strategy consisted mainly of abduction of the elevated leg. The damping ratio and the relative variance of the first principal movement showed a negative correlation (p < .05), suggesting that those with superior balancing effectiveness recruited more compensatory movements.