Establishing the noise : interday ecological reliability of countermovement jump variables in professional rugby union players

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ökologische Interday-Reliabilität von Variablen des Counter Movement Jumps bei professionellen Rugby-Union-Spielern
Autor:Howarth, David J.; Cohen, Daniel Dylan; McLean, Blake D.; Coutts, Aaron James
Erschienen in:Journal of strength and conditioning research
Veröffentlicht:36 (2022), 11, S. 3159-3166, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1064-8011, 1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004037
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202211007578
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was to examine the interday “ecological” reliability of a wide range of ground reaction force–derived countermovement jump (CMJ) variables. Thirty-six male, professional rugby union players performed 3 CMJs on 4 separate days over an 8-day period during the first week of preseason. We calculated reliability for 86 CMJ variables across 5 interday combinations using 2 criteria: mean output across 3 jump trials (Mean 3) and single output from the highest jump (Best JH). Interday coefficient of variation (CV) of the 86 variables in each CMJ phase, for Mean 3 and Best JH, respectively, ranged between concentric = 2–11% and 2–13%; eccentric = 1–45% and 1–107%; and landing = 4–32% and 6–45%. Mean 3 interday CV was lower in all 86 variables across every interday combination, compared with Best JH . CVs were lower in our cohort than previous studies, particularly for eccentric phase variables. There was no meaningful difference between interday conditions, suggesting any 2-day combination conducted within the first 8 days of preseason, represents a measure of “noise.” We did not apply arbitrary reliability “cut-offs” used in previous work (e.g., CV <10%); therefore, our analysis provides reference reliability for a wide range of CMJ variables. However, we recommend that practitioners assess reliability in their athletes, as it is likely to be environment, protocol, and cohort specific.