Community networks of sport and physical activity promotion : an analysis of structural properties and conditions of cooperation

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Kommunale Netzwerke zur Sport- und Bewegungsförderung : eine Analyse der strukturellen Eigenschaften und Bedingungen der Zusammenarbeit
Autor:Wolbring, Laura; Schmid, Steffen Christian Ekkehard; Niessner, Claudia; Woll, Alexander; Wäsche, Hagen
Erschienen in:BMC public health
Veröffentlicht:22 (2022), Art-ID 1966, [14 S.], Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1471-2458
DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14383-3
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202210007449
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Background: The importance of intersectoral cooperation networks among community organizations located in people’s immediate environments in addressing population health problems such as physical inactivity has come into focus in recent years. To date, there is limited evidence on how and why such networks emerge. Therefore, the aims of this study were (a) to analyze the structural properties and (b) to identify the conditions of cooperation in interorganizational community networks of sport and physical activity promotion.
Methods: Survey data on cooperative relationships and organizational attributes of sports and physical activity providers as well as sports administrating organizations in two community networks located in urban districts in southern Germany were collected (Network I: n = 133 organizations; Network II: n = 50 organizations). Two quantitative descriptive procedures – network analysis and stochastic analyses of network modeling (exponential random graphs) – were applied.
Results: Similar structures and conditions of cooperation were found in the networks (e.g. low density, centralization). The community sports administrations had the most central positions in both networks. Exponential random graph modeling showed that cooperation took place more frequently in triangular structures (closure effect) and revolved around a few central actors (preferential attachment effect). Organizations from different sectors cooperated more often than organizations from the same sector (heterophily effect).
Conclusion: The study provided valid and robust findings on significant mechanisms and conditions of interorganizational cooperation in community networks focused on sport and physical activity promotion. Based on the results, implications for the development and most efficient governance of these networks can be derived.