Can anthropometry be used to dictate participant-specific thigh marker placements which minimize error in hip joint center estimation?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Kann die Anthropometrie verwendet werden, um teilnehmerspezifische Platzierungen von Oberschenkelmarkern vorzuschreiben, die Fehler bei der Schätzung des Hüftgelenkzentrums minimieren?
Autor:Buchman-Pearle, Jessa M.; Acker, Stacey M.
Erschienen in:Journal of applied biomechanics
Veröffentlicht:38 (2022), 4, S. 246-254, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1065-8483, 1543-2688
DOI:10.1123/jab.2022-0042
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202209006701
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Specific participant characteristics may be leveraged to dictate marker placements which reduce soft tissue artifact; however, a better understanding of the relationships between participant characteristics and soft tissue artifact are first required. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy in which measures of whole-body and thigh anthropometry could predict mislocation error of the hip joint center, tracked using skin-mounted marker clusters. Fifty participants completed squatting and kneeling, while pelvis and lower limb motion were recorded. The effect of soft tissue artifact was estimated from 6 rigid thigh marker clusters by evaluating their ability to track the position of the hip joint center most like the pelvis cluster. Eighteen backward stepwise linear regressions were performed using 10 anthropometric measures as independent variables and the mean of the peak difference between the thigh and pelvis cluster-tracked hip joint centers. Fourteen models significantly predicted error with low to moderate fit (R = .38–.67), explaining 14% to 45% of variation. Partial correlations indicated that soft tissue artifact may increase with soft tissue volume and be altered by local soft tissue composition. However, it is not recommended that marker placement be adjusted based on anthropometry alone.