Modulations of corticospinal excitability following rapid ankle dorsiflexion in skill- and endurance-trained athletes

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Modulationen der kortikospinalen Erregbarkeit nach schneller Dorsalflexion des Sprunggelenks bei geschicklichkeits- und ausdauertrainierten Athleten
Autor:Hu, Nijia; Avela, Janne; Kidgell, Dawson John; Piirainen, Jarmo M.; Walker, Simon
Erschienen in:European journal of applied physiology
Veröffentlicht:122 (2022), 9, S. 2099-2109, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1439-6319, 0301-5548
DOI:10.1007/s00421-022-04981-9
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202209006483
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Purpose: Long-term sports training, such as skill and endurance training, leads to specific neuroplasticity. However, it remains unclear if muscle stretch-induced proprioceptive feedback influences corticospinal facilitation/inhibition differently between skill- and endurance-trained athletes. This study investigated modulation of corticospinal excitability following rapid ankle dorsiflexion between well-trained skill and endurance athletes. Methods: Ten skill- and ten endurance-trained athletes participated in the study. Corticospinal excitability was tested by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulations (TMS) at three different latencies following passive rapid ankle dorsiflexion. Motor evoked potential (MEP), short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and long-latency intracortical inhibition (LICI) were recorded by surface electromyography from the soleus muscle. Results: Compared to immediately before ankle dorsiflexion (Onset), TMS induced significantly greater MEPs during the supraspinal reaction period (~ 120 ms after short-latency reflex, SLR) in the skill group only (from 1.7 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 1.8%M-max, P = 0.005) despite both conditions being passive. ICF was significantly greater over all latencies in skill than endurance athletes (F (3, 45) = 4.64, P = 0.007), although no between-group differences for stimulations at specific latencies (e.g., at SLR) were observed. Conclusion: The skill group showed higher corticospinal excitability during the supraspinal reaction phase, which may indicate a “priming” of corticospinal excitability following rapid ankle dorsiflexion for a supraspinal reaction post-stretch, which appears absent in endurance-trained athletes.