Influence of state-level emergency planning policy requirements on secondary school adoption

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Einfluss eines staatlichen Notfallplanungspolitik auf die Notwendigkeiten der Umsetzung in einer weiterführenden Schule
Autor:Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E.; Kerr, Zachary Y.; Adams, William M.; Belval, Luke N.; Casa, Douglas J.
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:55 (2020), 10, S. 1062–1069, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-118-19
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202101000249
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context
Emergency action plans (EAPs) are a critical component in the management of catastrophic sport-related injury. Some state high school athletics associations and state legislation have required that schools develop EAPs, but little research exists on the influence of a statewide policy requirement on local adoption of these policies.
Objective
To examine the efficacy of a statewide policy requirement on local adoption of an EAP.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Online questionnaire.
Patients or Other Participants
Secondary school athletic trainers were invited to complete a survey (n = 9642); 1136 completed the survey, yielding an 11.7% response rate.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Survey responses on the adoption of EAPs along with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator (CPR/AED) requirements were cross-referenced with published statewide policies to determine the prevalence of EAP adoption. We evaluated the adoption of emergency action plan components based on the National Athletic Trainers' Association's emergency planning position statement along with CPR/AED requirements to determine component-specific prevalence. We compared the prevalence of EAP and component adoption between states that required EAPs and specific components of EAPs and states without such requirements.
Results
Athletic trainers in states that required adoption of an EAP reported including more components of the emergency planning position statement (mean = 8 ± 4, median = 9) than in states without a requirement (mean = 7 ± 4, median = 8). The adoption of EAP components did not differ between states that required specific components of the EAP versus development of the EAP only. However, schools in states with both EAP and CPR/AED training requirements reported higher rates of CPR/AED training implementation (95.5%) than states that only required CPR/AED training (81.6%, prevalence ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.01, 1.20).
Conclusions
Based on these data, statewide policy requirements for the development of an EAP may be associated with increasing adoption of EAPs.