Is soccer just for machos? : the construction of masculinity in contemporary peruvian “Kick-Lit” stories and “Kick-Flicks”

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ist Fußball nur was für Machos : die Konstruktion von Männlichkeit in zeitgenössischen peruanischen "Kick-Lit"-Geschichten und "Kick-Flicks"?
Autor:Campos, Jesús Hidalgo
Erschienen in:The Palgrave Handbook of masculinity and sport
Veröffentlicht:Cham: Palgrave Macmillan (Verlag), 2020, S. 537-555, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Sammelwerksbeitrag
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-19799-5_30
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202009007998
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

When analyzing Peruvian contemporary films and novels that use soccer as their main topic (which, in the present chapter, I called “kick-flicks” and “kick-lit” stories, respectively), we can observe that they are mainly focused on the construction of hegemonic masculinity: the male protagonists of these fictions succeed professionally, socially and in the private sphere only if they are able to practice, understand, enjoy and benefit from the beautiful game. In contrast, the male figures that do not fit under this representation of a macho (i.e. those belonging to marginalized and subordinated masculinities groups) are ridiculed, infantilized and portrayed as pariahs, while most of the female characters are depicted as mere secondary figures defined by their relationship with a male character or following gender archetypes (the maternal figure, the witch, etc.). The following lines will examine three Peruvian texts (two novels and one film) released in the last decade that show that in the literature and cinema of this South American nation, football is seen as an activity “just for machos”. Following what diverse Latin American Studies scholars have maintained about masculinities in this region, the analysis of these three Peruvian fictions sheds light about the fact that physical features and heterosexuality do not suffice to become part of hegemonic groups for men. In that sense, these stories reveal that, as R. W. Connell has argued in her classic book Masculinities, class and race represent factors that marginalize men from hegemonic male elites.