Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii during forward and backward arm cycling is direction- and phase-dependent

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Die kortikospinale Erregbarkeit des Bizeps und Trizeps brachii während Vorwärts- und Rückwärts-Armegometrie ist richtungs- und phasenabhängig
Autor:Nippard, Anna P.; Lockyer, Evan J.; Button, Duane C.; Power, Kevin E.
Erschienen in:Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism
Veröffentlicht:45 (2020), 1, S. 72-80, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1715-5312, 1715-5320
DOI:10.1139/apnm-2019-0043
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202004002635
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was to evaluate corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii during forward (FWD) and backward (BWD) arm cycling. Corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and transmastoid electrical stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEPs), respectively. MEPs and CMEPs were recorded from the biceps and triceps brachii during FWD and BWD arm cycling at 2 positions, 6 and 12 o’clock. The 6 o’clock position corresponded to mid-elbow flexion and extension during FWD and BWD cycling, respectively, while 12 o’clock corresponded to mid-elbow extension and flexion during FWD and BWD cycling, respectively. During the flexion phase, MEP and CMEP amplitudes of the biceps brachii were higher during FWD cycling. However, during the extension phase, MEP and CMEP amplitudes were higher during BWD cycling. For the triceps brachii, MEP amplitudes were higher during FWD cycling regardless of phase. However, CMEP amplitudes were phase-dependent. During the flexion phase, CMEPs of the triceps brachii were higher during FWD cycling compared with BWD, but during the extension phase CMEPs were higher during BWD cycling compared with FWD. The data suggest that corticospinal and spinal excitability to the biceps brachii is phase- and direction-dependent. In the triceps brachii, spinal, but not corticospinal, excitability is phase-dependent when comparing FWD and BWD cycling. Novelty: This is the first study to assess corticospinal excitability during FWD and BWD locomotor output. Corticospinal excitability during arm cycling depends on the direction, phase, and muscle being assessed.