Validity and reliability assessment of 3-D camera-based capture barbell velocity tracking device

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Bewertung der Validität und Reliabilität eines 3-D-Kamera-basierten Geräts zur Erfassung der Geschwindigkeit der Langhantel
Autor:Tomasevicz, Curtis L.; Hasenkamp, Ryan M.; Ridenour, Daniel T.; Bach, Christopher W.
Erschienen in:Journal of science and medicine in sport
Veröffentlicht:23 (2020), 1, S. 7-14, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1440-2440, 1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.014
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU202003001709
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Abstract: Velocity-based training (VBT) requires the monitoring of lift velocity plus the prescribed resistance weight. A validated and reliable device is needed to capture the velocity and power of several exercises.
Objectives: The study objectives were to examine the validity and reliability of the Elite Form Training System® (EFTS) for measures of peak velocity (PV), average velocity (AV), peak power (PP), and average power (AP).
Design: Validity of the EFTS was assessed by comparing measurements simultaneously obtained via the Qualisys Track Manager software (C-motion, version 3.90.21, Gothenburg, Sweden) utilizing 6 motion capture cameras (Oqus 400, 240 Hz, Gothenburg, Sweden).
Methods: Six participants performed 6 resistance exercises in 2 sessions: power clean, dead lift, bench press, back squat, front squat, and jump squat.
Results: Simple Pearson correlations indicated the validity of the device (0.982, 0.971, 0.973, and 0.982 for PV, AV, PP, and AP respectively) and ranged from 0.868 to 0.998 for the 6 exercises. The test-retest reliability of the EFTS was shown by lack of significant change in the Pearson correlation (<0.3% for each variable) between the 2 sessions. The multiple count error rate was 2.0% and the missed count error rate was 2.1%.
Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the EFTS were classified as excellent across all variables and exercises with only one exercise showing a slight influence by the velocity of the movement.