Combining higher-load and lower-load resistance training exercises : a systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from complex training studies
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Kombination von Krafttrainingsübungen mit höherer und geringerer Last : eine systematische Übersicht und Metaanalyse der Ergebnisse von Studien zum Komplextraining |
---|---|
Autor: | Bauer, Pascal; Uebellacker, Florian; Mitter, Benedikt; Aigner, Alexander J.; Hasenoehrl, Timothy; Ristl, Robin; Tschan, Harald; Seitz, Laurent B. |
Erschienen in: | Journal of science and medicine in sport |
Veröffentlicht: | 22 (2019), 7, S. 838-851, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 1440-2440, 1878-1861 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.006 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201908005983 |
Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
Objectives: The aim of the present meta-analytical review was to determine the effectiveness of training programmes combining higher-load and lower-load exercises in one workout (i.e. complex training [CT]) on lower-body performance. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL and Scopus) was conducted to identify all publications up to 7 March 2018. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model with the dependent variables countermovement jump (CMJ) height, squat jump (SJ) height, one-repetition maximum (1-RM) squat performance and sprint time for 5 m, 10 m, 20 m, 30 m and 40 m, respectively. Results: The analysis comprised 33 studies and a total of 1064 healthy participants. The meta-analysis revealed that CT is effective in improving CMJ (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6%–12.3%), SJ (95% CI 8.0%–17.4%), 1-RM squat (95% CI 16.4%–30.7%) and sprint performance (5 m = 95% CI −14.8% to −0.9%, 10 m = 95% CI −6.0% to −2.1%, 20 m = 95% CI −7.4% to −1.4%, 30 m = 95% CI −8.0% to −0.6%). However, when directly compared to traditional training methods, only 1-RM squat strength performance and 20 m sprint time were superior following CT interventions (95% CI 0.2%–13.7% and 95% CI −1.6% to −0.1%, respectively) Conclusions: CT is an acceptable method for improving jump, strength and sprint performance in athletes. Compared to traditional training methods, CT seems to produce superior training effects only for 1-RM squat and 20 m sprint performance; however, these findings were influenced by single studies and should be therefore interpreted with circumspection.