Transfer of training : how specific should we be?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Trainingstransfer : wie spezifisch sollten wir sein?
Autor:Brearley, Simon; Bishop, Christopher R.
Erschienen in:Strength and conditioning journal
Veröffentlicht:41 (2019), 3, S. 97-109, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1533-4295, 1073-6840
DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000450
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201908005573
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

A spectrum of approaches exists among strength coaches as to the degree of specificity required to optimize training transfer to targeted athletic performance. The “problem” with specificity is that it is in conflict with overload. Some giving precedence to specificity find a solution in applying overload through variation, whereas others seek to traditionally overload 1 or 2 elements of the sporting movement. Advocates of general training more readily sacrifice specificity for the development of capacities. In applying these contrasting approaches to the hypothetical target task of accelerative sprinting, this review combines evidence- and logic-led arguments to evaluate the efficacy of each. As such, a summary of literature is presented. In most contexts, a mixed-methods approach remains recommended as degree of transfer to targeted athletic performance appears as dependent on athlete status as it is on the specificity of the training task.