Virtual reality exercise intradialysis to improve physical function : a feasibility randomized trial

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Training der Intradialyse in Virtual-Reality zur Verbesserung der körperlichen Funktion : eine randomisierte Machbarkeitsstudie
Autor:Segura‐Ortí, Eva; Pérez‐Domínguez, Borja; Ortega‐Pérez de Villar, Lucía; Meléndez‐Oliva, Erika; Martínez‐Gramage, Javier; García‐Maset, Rafael; Gil‐Gómez, José Antonio
Erschienen in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
Veröffentlicht:29 (2019), 1, S. 89-94, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0905-7188, 1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/sms.13304
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201901000681
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objective: The main objective of this investigation was to assess feasibility of conducting a future RCT with an intradialysis non‐immersive virtual reality exercise intervention. The secondary aim was to explore the impact of either conventional or VR exercise on physical function.
Design: Feasibility randomized trial.
Participants: Eighteen subjects who participated in a 16‐week intradialysis combined exercise program.
Interventions: The program lasted four additional weeks of either combined exercise or virtual reality exercise.
Main outcome measures: Physical function was measured through several reliable tests (sit‐to‐stand‐to‐sit tests 10 and 60, gait speed, one‐leg heel‐rise tests, and 6‐minute walk test) at baseline, after 16 weeks of intradialysis combined exercise and by the end of four additional weeks of exercise. Adherence to the exercise programs was registered.
Results: There was a significant time effect, so that physical function improved in both groups. By the end of the 20 weeks, function improved as measured through the sit‐to‐stand‐to‐sit tests 10 and 60, gait speed, one‐leg heel‐rise left leg, and the 6‐minute walk test. Changes that did not occur due to error in the test were seen after 20 weeks were achieved in the sit‐to‐stand‐to‐sit test 60, gait speed, one‐leg heel‐rise test for the left leg, and 6‐minute walking test.
Conclusion: Virtual reality was a feasible intervention. Both interventions improved physical function. Adherence was not significantly different between groups.