Abstract des Autors

Introduction: There are an increasing number of reports describing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) in otherwise healthy endurance athletes. The Wells score is the most commonly used clinical prediction rule to diagnose DVT/PE in clinical populations. However, the Wells score may have limited utility for recognition of DVT/PE in athletes, contributing to missed or delayed diagnosis. Objective: We performed an analysis of the ability of the Wells score to identify DVT/PE events in athletes through a review of published case reports. Methods: A systematic search of the literature yielded 11 case reports. Results: The Wells score had a 100% failure rate in identifying athletes with DVT (0/6) and PE (0/5), resulting in a delayed diagnosis for DVT of 20 ± 14 days. Retrospectively removing ‘differential diagnosis’ from the clinical prediction rule for DVT changed the Wells score median from 0 (range: −1 to 0) to 2 (range: 1 to 2); the threshold for predicting DVT as ‘likely’. There were limited clinical characteristics captured in the Wells score for PE that were applicable to athletes, highlighting the need for reappraisal. Although the Wells score failed to accurately triage athletes with known DVT and/or PE, the addition of a D-dimer value (mean: 1566 ± 758ng/dL) to the Wells score correctly identified 9/9 athletes. Conclusions: The Wells score had a 100% failure rate for triaging athletes with known DVT/PE. When performed, D-dimer adequately facilitated the additional diagnostic testing required for a timely diagnosis of DVT/PE in athletes. Improving awareness of an atypical presentation of thrombotic events in athletes may reduce the widespread underestimation of DVT/PE among athletes and facilitate the additional testing required for a timely diagnosis.