Relationship between isometric contraction intensity and muscle hardness assessed by ultrasound strain elastography

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Beziehung zwischen der isometrischen Kontraktionsintensität und der Muskelhärte, die durch die Ultraschall-Dehnungselastographie ermittelt wurde
Autor:Inami, Takayuki; Tsujimura, Toru; Shimizu, Takuya; Watanabe, Takemasa; Lau, Wing Yin; Nosaka, Kazunori
Erschienen in:European journal of applied physiology
Veröffentlicht:117 (2017), 5, S. 843-852, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1439-6319, 0301-5548
DOI:10.1007/s00421-016-3528-2
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201806004514
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Introduction: Ultrasound elastography is used to assess muscle hardness or stiffness; however, no previous studies have validated muscle hardness measures using ultrasound strain elastography (SE). This study investigated the relationship between plantar flexor isometric contraction intensity and gastrocnemius hardness assessed by SE. We hypothesised that the muscle would become harder linearly with an increase in the contraction intensity of the plantar flexors.
Methods: Fifteen young women (20.1 +/- 0.8 years) performed isometric contractions of the ankle plantar flexors at four different intensities (25, 50, 75, 100% of maximal voluntary contraction force: MVC) at 0° plantar flexion. Using SE images, the strain ratio (SR) between the muscle and an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus 22.6 kPa) placed over the skin was calculated (muscle/coupler); pennation angle and muscle thickness were measured for the resting and contracting conditions.
Results: SR decreased with increasing contraction intensity from rest (1.28 +/- 0.20) to 25% (0.99 +/- 0.21), 50% (0.61 +/- 0.15), 75% (0.34 +/- 0.1) and 100% MVC (0.20 +/- 0.05). SR decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with increasing MVC from rest to 75% MVC, but levelled off from 75 and 100% MVC. SR was negatively correlated with pennation angle (r = −0.80, P < 0.01) and muscle thickness ( r= −0.78,  P< 0.01).
Conclusion: SR appears to represent muscle hardness changes in response to contraction intensity changes, in the assumption that the gastrocnemius muscle contraction intensity is proportional to the plantar flexion intensity. We concluded that gastrocnemius muscle hardness changes could be validly assessed by SR, and the force–hardness relationship was not linear.