Post-exercise ingestion of carbohydrate, protein and water : a systematic review and meta-analysis for effects on subsequent athletic performance
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Die Einnahme von Kohlenhydraten, Proteinen und Wasser nach dem Training : eine systematische Übersicht und Meta-Analyse über Auswirkungen auf die nachfolgende sportliche Leistung |
---|---|
Autor: | McCartney, Danielle; Desbrow, Ben; Irwin, Christopher Garry |
Erschienen in: | Sports medicine |
Veröffentlicht: | 48 (2018), 2, S. 379-408, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 0112-1642, 1179-2035 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40279-017-0800-5 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201803001845 |
Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
Background: Athletes may complete consecutive exercise sessions with limited recovery time between bouts (e.g. </= 4 h). Nutritional strategies that optimise post-exercise recovery in these situations are therefore important.
Objective: This two-part review investigated the effect of consuming carbohydrate (CHO) and protein with water (W) following exercise on subsequent athletic (endurance/anaerobic exercise) performance.
Data Sources: Studies were identified by searching the online databases SPORTDiscus, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus.
Study Eligibility Criteria and Interventions: Investigations that measured endurance performance (>/= 5 min duration) </= 4 h after a standardised exercise bout (any type) under the following control vs. intervention conditions were included: Part 1: W vs. CHO ingested with an equal volume of W (CHO + W); and, Part 2: CHO + W vs. protein (PRO) ingested with CHO and an equal volume of W (PRO + CHO + W), where CHO or energy intake was matched.
Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Publications were examined for bias using the Rosendal scale. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted to evaluate intervention efficacy.
Results: The quality assessment yielded a Rosendal score of 63 +/- 9% (mean +/- standard deviation). Part 1: 45 trials (n = 486) were reviewed. Ingesting CHO + W (102 +/- 50 g CHO; 0.8 +/- 0.6 g CHO/kg/h) improved exercise performance compared with W (1.6 +/- 0.7 L); %Δ mean power output = 4.0, 95% confidence interval 3.2–4.7 (I 2 = 43.9). Improvement was attenuated when participants were ‘Fed’ (a meal 2–4 h prior to the initial bout) as opposed to ‘Fasted’ (p = 0.012). Part 2: 13 trials (n = 125) were reviewed. Ingesting PRO + CHO + W (35 +/- 26 g PRO; 0.5 +/- 0.4 g PRO/kg) did not affect exercise performance compared with CHO + W (115 +/- 61 g CHO; 0.6 +/- 0.3 g CHO·kg body mass/h; 1.2 +/- 0.6 L); %Δ mean power output = 0.5, 95% confidence interval − 0.5 to 1.6 (I 2 = 72.9).
Conclusions: Athletes with limited time for recovery between consecutive exercise sessions should prioritise CHO and fluid ingestion to enhance subsequent athletic performance.