Single-task and dual-task tandem gait test performance after concussion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Leistung beim Tandem-Gehtest mit und ohne Zusatzaufgabe nach Gehirnerschütterung
Autor:Howell, David R.; Osternig, Louis R.; Chou, Li-Shan
Erschienen in:Journal of science and medicine in sport
Veröffentlicht:20 (2017), 7, S. 622-626, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1440-2440, 1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.020
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201709008335
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objectives: To compare single-task and dual-task tandem gait test performance between athletes after concussion with controls on observer-timed, spatio-temporal, and center-of-mass (COM) balance control measurements. Design: Ten participants (19.0 ± 5.5 years) were prospectively identified and completed a tandem gait test protocol within 72 h of concussion and again 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months post-injury. Seven uninjured controls (20.0 ± 4.5 years) completed the same protocol in similar time increments. Methods: Tandem gait test trials were performed with (dual-task) and without (single-task) concurrently performing a cognitive test as whole-body motion analysis was performed. Outcome variables included test completion time, average tandem gait velocity, cadence, and whole-body COM frontal plane displacement. Results: Concussion participants took significantly longer to complete the dual-task tandem gait test than controls throughout the first 2 weeks post-injury (mean time = 16.4 [95% CI: 13.4–19.4] vs. 10.1 [95% CI: 6.4–13.7] seconds; p = 0.03). Single-task tandem gait times were significantly lower 72 h post-injury (p = 0.04). Dual-task cadence was significantly lower for concussion participants than controls (89.5 [95% CI: 68.6–110.4] vs. 127.0 [95% CI: 97.4–156.6] steps/minute; p = 0.04). Moderately-high to high correlations between tandem gait test time and whole-body COM medial-lateral displacement were detected at each time point during dual-task gait (rs = 0.70–0.93; p = 0.03–0.001). Conclusions: Adding a cognitive task during the tandem gait test resulted in longer detectable deficits post-concussion compared to the traditional single-task tandem gait test. As a clinical tool to assess dynamic motor function, tandem gait may assist with return to sport decisions after concussion.