The acute effects of bodyweight suspension exercise on muscle activation and muscular fatigue

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Akute Effekte von Übungen zur Reduktion des Körpergewichtes auf die Muskelaktivierung und Muskelermüdung
Autor:Cayot, Trent E.; Lauver, Jakob D.; Scheuermann, Barry W.
Erschienen in:European journal of sport science
Veröffentlicht:17 (2017), 6, S. 681-689, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1746-1391, 1536-7290
DOI:10.1080/17461391.2017.1298670
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201708006195
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

This investigation examined effects of two exercise modes (barbell, BB; bodyweight suspension, BWS) on muscle activation, resistance load, and fatigue. During session one, nine resistance-trained males completed an elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1RM). During sessions two and three, subjects completed standing biceps curls to fatigue at 70% 1RM utilizing a randomized exercise mode. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded muscle activation of the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae. BWS resistance load was measured using a force transducer. Standing maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the elbow flexors recorded at 90° were used to determine the isometric force decrement and rate of fatigue (ROF) during exercise. sEMG and resistance load data were divided into 25% contraction duration bins throughout the concentric phase. BWS resulted in a 67.7 ± 7.4% decline in resistance load throughout the concentric phase (p ≤ 0.05). As a result, BB elicited higher mean resistance loads (31.4 ± 4.0 kg) and biceps brachii sEMG (84.7 ± 27.8% maximal voluntary isometric contractions, MVIC) compared with BWS (20.4 ± 3.4 kg, 63.4 ± 21.6% MVIC). No difference in rectus abdominis or erector spinae sEMG was detected between exercise modes. Isometric force decrement was greater during BWS (−21.7 ± 7.0 kg) compared with BB (−14.9 ± 4.7 kg); however, BB (−3.0 ± 0.8 kg/set) resulted in a steeper decline in ROF compared with BWS (−1.7 ± 0.6 kg/set). The variable resistance loading and greater isometric force decrement observed suggest that select BWS exercises may resemble variable resistance exercise more than previously considered.