Comparing the fullerton advanced balance scale with the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to assess postural control in patients with parkinson disease
Gespeichert in:
| Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Vergleich der Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB-D) mit dem Mini-BESTest und der Berg Balance Scale zur Feststellung der Haltungskontrolle bei Parkinson-Patienten |
|---|---|
| Autor: | Schlenstedt, Christian; Brombacher, Stephanie; Hartwigsen, Gesa; Weisser, Burkhard; Möller, Bettina; Deuschl, Günther |
| Erschienen in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| Veröffentlicht: | 96 (2015), 2, S. 218-225, Lit. |
| Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
| Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
| Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| ISSN: | 0003-9993, 1532-821X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.002 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | |
| Erfassungsnummer: | PU201707005468 |
| Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
Objectives
To validate the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD); and to compare the FAB Scale with the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS).
Design
Observational study to assess concurrent validity, test-retest, and interrater reliability of the FAB Scale in patients with PD and to compare the distribution of the scale with the Mini-BESTest and BBS.
Setting
University hospital in an urban community.
Participants
Patients with idiopathic PD (N=85; Hoehn and Yahr stages 1–4).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
FAB Scale, Mini-BESTest, BBS, timed Up and Go test, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and visual analog scale.
Results
Interrater (3 raters) and test-retest (3±1d) reliability were high for all scales (ICCs≥.95). The FAB Scale was highly correlated with the Mini-BESTest (Spearman ρ=.87) and timed Up and Go test item of the Mini-BESTest (Spearman ρ=.83). In contrast with the BBS, the FAB Scale and Mini-BESTest have only minimal ceiling effects. The FAB Scale demonstrated the most symmetric distribution when compared with the Mini-BESTest and BBS (skewness: FAB scale: −.54; Mini-BESTest: −1.07; BBS: −2.14).
Conclusions
The FAB Scale is a valid and reliable tool to assess postural control in patients with PD. No ceiling effect was noted for the FAB Scale. Although the items of the FAB Scale are more detailed when compared with the Mini-BESTest, interrater and test-retest reliability were excellent. The scale is a promising tool to detect small changes of the postural control system in individuals with PD.