Modulation of exercise-induced spinal loop properties in response to oxygen availability

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Trainingsinduzierte Veränderungen der Bedingungen des Reflexbogens als Reaktion auf die Verfügbarkeit von Sauerstoff
Autor:Rupp, Thomas; Racinais, Sébastien; Bringard, Aurélien ; Lapole, Thomas; Perrey, Stéphane
Erschienen in:European journal of applied physiology
Veröffentlicht:115 (2015), 3, S. 471-482, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1439-6319, 0301-5548
DOI:10.1007/s00421-014-3032-5
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201606004189
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

This study investigated the effects of acute hypoxia on spinal reflexes and soleus muscle function after a sustained contraction of the plantar flexors at 40 % of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). Fifteen males (age 25.3 +/- 0.9 year) performed the fatigue task at two different inspired O2 fractions (FiO2 = 0.21/0.11) in a randomized and single-blind fashion. Before, at task failure and after 6, 12 and 18 min of passive recovery, the Hoffman-reflex (H max) and M-wave (M max) were recorded at rest and voluntary activation (VA), surface electromyogram (RMSmax), M-wave (M sup) and V-wave (V sup) were recorded during MVC. Normalized H-reflex (H max/M max) was significantly depressed pre-exercise in hypoxia compared with normoxia (0.31 +/- 0.08 and 0.36 +/- 0.08, respectively, P < 0.05). Hypoxia did not affect time to task failure (mean time of 453.9 +/- 32.0 s) and MVC decrease at task failure (−18 % in normoxia vs. −16 % in hypoxia). At task failure, VA (−8 %), RMSmax/M sup (−11 %), H max/M max (−27 %) and V sup/M sup (−37 %) decreased (P < 0.05), but with no FiO2 effect. H max/M max restored significantly throughout recovery in hypoxia but not in normoxia, while V sup/M sup restored significantly during recovery in normoxia but not in hypoxia (P < 0.05). Collectively, these findings indicate that central adaptations resulting from sustained submaximal fatiguing contraction were not different in hypoxia and normoxia at task failure. However, the FiO2-induced differences in spinal loop properties pre-exercise and throughout recovery suggest possible specific mediation by the hypoxic-sensitive group III and IV muscle afferents, supraspinal regulation mechanisms being mainly involved in hypoxia while spinal ones may be predominant in normoxia.