A comparison of gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis electromyography amplitude in the parallel, full, and front squat variations in resistance-trained females

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ein Vergleich der Elektromyographieamplitude von Gluteus maximus , Bizeps femoris und Vastus lateralis bei Parallel-, Ganz- und Frontkniebeugevariationen bei krafttrainierten Frauen
Autor:Contreras, Bret; Vigotsky, Andrew D.; Schoenfeld, Brad Jon; Beardsley, Chris; Cronin, John B.
Erschienen in:Journal of applied biomechanics
Veröffentlicht:32 (2016), 1, S. 16–22, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1065-8483, 1543-2688
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0113
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201606003712
Quelle:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Contreras, Bret
A2  - Contreras, Bret
A2  - Vigotsky, Andrew D.
A2  - Schoenfeld, Brad Jon
A2  - Beardsley, Chris
A2  - Cronin, John B.
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Bewegungslehre
KW  - Biomechanik
KW  - Elektromyographie
KW  - Frau
KW  - Kniebeuge
KW  - Krafttraining
KW  - M. biceps femoris
KW  - M. gluteus maximus
KW  - M. vastus lateralis
KW  - Muskelaktivität
KW  - Trainingswissenschaft
LA  - eng
TI  - A comparison of gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis electromyography amplitude in the parallel, full, and front squat variations in resistance-trained females
TT  - Ein Vergleich der Elektromyographieamplitude von Gluteus maximus , Bizeps femoris und Vastus lateralis bei Parallel-, Ganz- und Frontkniebeugevariationen bei krafttrainierten Frauen
PY  - 2016
N2  - Front, full, and parallel squats are some of the most popular squat variations. The purpose of this investigation was to compare mean and peak electromyography (EMG) amplitude of the upper gluteus maximus, lower gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis of front, full, and parallel squats. Thirteen healthy women (age = 28.9 ± 5.1 y; height = 164 ± 6.3 cm; body mass = 58.2 ± 6.4 kg) performed 10 repetitions of their estimated 10-repetition maximum of each respective variation. There were no statistical (P ≤ .05) differences between full, front, and parallel squats in any of the tested muscles. Given these findings, it can be concluded that the front, full, or parallel squat can be performed for similar EMG amplitudes. However, given the results of previous research, it is recommended that individuals use a full range of motion when squatting, assuming full range can be safely achieved, to promote more favorable training adaptations. Furthermore, despite requiring lighter loads, the front squat may provide a similar training stimulus to the back squat.
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0113
DO  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0113
SP  - S. 16–22
SN  - 1065-8483
JO  - Journal of applied biomechanics
IS  - 1
VL  - 32
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
ID  - PU201606003712
ER  -