Say what? An analysis of spontaneous self-talk categorization

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Wie bitte?: eine Analyse der Kategorisierung von spontanen Selbstgesprächen
Autor:Raalte, Judy L. van; Cornelius, Allen E.; Copeskey, Maureen K.; Brewer, Britton W.
Erschienen in:The sport psychologist
Veröffentlicht:28 (2014), 4, S. 390-393, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0888-4781, 1543-2793
DOI:10.1123/tsp.2013-0017
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201505003868
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Research exploring spontaneously generated self-talk has involved recording performers’ self-talk categorized by researchers. The actor-observer bias, suggests that actors (performers) and observers (researchers) may perceive the same situation (e.g., self-talk) differently. The purpose of this study was to explore the actor-observer bias and validity of self-talk categorization. College students’ (n = 30) spontaneous self-talk was audio recorded during a dart throwing task. Participants then listened to and categorized their self-talk. Three independent researchers reviewed written transcripts and categorized the self-talk. Another three researchers who had not read the transcripts listened to audio recordings and categorized the same self-talk. Results confirmed actor-observer bias predictions. Spontaneous self-talk ratings made by participants were similar to but distinct from those made by researchers reading transcripts or listening to self-talk audio recordings. These results suggest that participant categorization of spontaneous self-talk may be a valid strategy to enhance understanding of self-talk used in competitive settings. Verf.-Referat