Cognitive intervention response is related to habitual physical activity in older adults

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Kognitives Intervenieren steht im Zusammenhang mit gewohnheitsmäßiger körperlicher Aktivität bei älteren Erwachsenen
Autor:Thiel, Christian; Vogt, Lutz; Tesky, Valentina A.; Meroth, Linda; Jakob, Marion; Sahlender, Sandra; Pantel, Johannes; Banzer, Winfried
Erschienen in:Aging clinical and experimental research
Veröffentlicht:24 (2012), 1, S. 47-55, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1594-0667, 1720-8319
DOI:10.3275/7569
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201405004457
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Background and aims: This study analysed the associations between physical activity and the effects of cognitive training on perceived cognitive functioning and life satisfaction in older adults. Methods: A sample of 114 intervention group participants (65–89 yrs) received weekly group sessions of cognitive stimulation for two months. This sample was stratified into groups according to habitual physical activity (PA) and matched with 45 controls. Participants completed the Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q), Nuremberg Self-Rating List (NSL) and Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale — Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at three time-points (baseline, 2 months, and 6-month follow-up). Results: At baseline, groups did not differ in absolute MAC-Q, NSL or ADAS-Cog scores. NSL difference scores (follow-up score minus baseline NSL score) of the three cognitive intervention groups (>6.95h MVPA/wk; 3.64–6.95h MVPA/wk; <3.64h MVPA/wk) and controls were −3.8±7.3, −2.5±11.0, +0.3±12.0 and +0.1±9.1 over 2 months, and −4.2±7.6, −4.0±14.0, −1.8±7.7 and +0.5±9.7 over 6 months, respectively. MAC-Q difference scores were −1.1±2.9, −1.1±3.4, −0.3±3.9 and +0.3±2.7 over 2 months, and −1.5±3.2, −0.8±2.9, −0.3±2.9 and +0.3±2.2 over 6 months. The groups significantly (p<0.05) differed on NSL and MAC-Q difference scores. Specifically, the more active groups differed from controls, and in some cases from the least active group. Groups did not differ on ADAS-Cog difference scores. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a relation between amount of physical activity and the effects of a cognitive stimulation intervention on perceived cognitive functioning and life satisfaction. Physically more active persons may gain more benefit from cognitive stimulation than the physically less active. Verf.-Referat