Abstract des Autors

The present paper was devoted to philosophic and pedagogical aspects of human ontokinesiology. Continuing in some kind the V.K. Balsevich's and L.I. Lubysheva's research line in the work of the section of physical culture and sport of the Russian academy of education, the researchers consider necessary and advisable to emphasize not only the formal but also substantial character of such succession and the present theoretical-methodological collaboration. Therefore they return to active discussion of the problem of sportization stated by its authors. In view of the indicated in the paper methodological mistakes and deficiencies it is premature to speak and think of creative anthropology as a new direction of anthropological development. It is assumed necessary to avoid idealization of overoptimistic ideas while considering the level, terms and perspectives of sportization of physical education, but correct and advisable to estimate mass sport as a field of compromise synthesis, or transition, where elite sport faces physical education. Herewith, the Balsevich and other authors' ontokinesiological developments are highly estimated, seeing the fundamental natural-scientific foundation in it while creating the system of overall and continuous physical education. Verf.-Referat