Comparability and reliability of paper- and computer-based measures of psychosocial constructs for adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviors
Gespeichert in:
| Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Vergleichbarkeit und Reliabilität von papier- und computerbasierten Messungen psycho-sozialer Konstrukte von bewegungsorientiertem und bewegungsarmem Verhalten während der Pubertät |
|---|---|
| Autor: | Norman, Gregory J.; Sallis, James F.; Gaskins, Ronnesia |
| Erschienen in: | Research quarterly for exercise and sport |
| Veröffentlicht: | 76 (2005), 3, S. 315–323, Lit. |
| Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
| Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
| Medienart: | Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| ISSN: | 0270-1367, 2168-3824 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599302 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | |
| Erfassungsnummer: | PU201001000145 |
| Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
This study assessed the comparability and reliability of paper-based and computer-based administration of psychosocial construct measures related to adolescents engaging in physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Adolescents ( n = 76; 55% girls, 49% Hispanic, 18% non-Hispanic-white; M age = 13 years) completed measures of behavior change strategies, self-efficacy, decisional balance, family and peer influences, enjoyment, activity choices, and environmental influences. Overall, the adolescents provided equivalent responses on paper and computer formats. Reliability estimates were generally good for the multiple-item constructs, but single-item measures tended to demonstrate low reliability. Average scale internal consistency was significantly higher for measures administered with the computer format compared to the paper format, but test-rest reliability estimates were not significantly different between formats. Verf.-Referat