Trekking poles increase physiological responses to hiking without increased perceived exertion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Trekkingstöcke steigern die physiologischen Reaktionen beim Wandern ohne Zunahme der Ermüdungswahrnehmung
Autor:Saunders, Michael J.; Hipp, G. Ryan; Wenos, David L.; Deaton, Michael L.
Erschienen in:Journal of strength and conditioning research
Veröffentlicht:22 (2008), 5, S. 1468-1474, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1064-8011, 1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817bd4e8
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200912006662
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Trekking poles are used by hikers for improved stability and lowered leg fatigue due to increased upper body muscle involvement. However, the weight of the poles and exaggerated upper body movement when using poles may increase total energy expenditure at a given walking speed. Few studies have investigated the physiological responses of hiking with trekking poles outside the laboratory setting. The purposes of this study were to determine if trekking poles altered physiological responses to hiking on varied terrain, and whether responses between trials were dependent on the grade of the terrain. Fourteen recreational hikers completed four hiking trials over a course that included sustained sections of flat (0 ± 1% grade), steep uphill (>10% grade), gradual uphill (5% grade), gradual downhill (-5% grade) and steep downhill (<-10% grade) terrain. Subjects walked at a self-selected speed that was matched across trials using time-splits and a metronome. Two trials were conducted with hiking poles and two without poles. VO2 was significantly elevated (p <0.05) during the pole trials (1502.9 ± 510.7 ml/min) compared to the no-pole trials (1362.4 ± 473.2 ml/min). Similarly, ventilatory efficiency ([latin capital V with dot above]E) (43.1 ± 9.6; 38.3 ± 10.1 L/min) and heart rate (HR) (112.1 ± 9.7; 105.7 ± 10.4 bt/min) were significantly higher during the pole trials than the no-pole trials. However, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) was not altered by pole condition (8.5 ± 0.7; 8.4 ± 0.8). Comparisons within each grade revealed significantly higher physiological responses for VO2, [latin capital V with dot above]E and HR in the pole-condition at all grades, with no significant variable*grade interactions. RPE measures were not significantly different between pole trials at any grade. These data suggest that trekking poles may be a beneficial tool for increasing caloric expenditure, as energy production increased during exercise without increased perceptions of effort. Verf.-Referat